The “Right to Try” Investigational Drugs: Science and Stories in the Access Debate

Rebecca Dresser

93 Texas L. Rev. 1631

PDF Document

Right-to-try laws grant terminally ill patients the right to try investigational drugs. States began enacting these laws in 2014. Professor Dresser analyzes the rhetoric used by access advocates and defenders of access restrictions in the policy debates surrounding right-to-try laws. She concludes that the debate up until this point has included selective storytelling that has failed to give an accurate picture of the implications of right-to-try laws and that such selectiveness needs to be remedied in order to have informed debate on the subject.

Where Law and Science (and Religion?) Meet

David L. Faigman

93 Texas L. Rev. 1659

PDF Document

The law is a great borrower, taking as it sees fit findings from science and values and insights of religion. It does so, however, exclusively for reasons associated with its own objectives which are many and varied and include ideals of justice, fairness, and accuracy, as well as more mundane considerations such as efficiency and finality. In this Article, Professor Faigman explores the intersection of law and science and offers some tentative observations regarding where law and science have their roots—in religion.

Criminal Law’s Science Lag: How Criminal Justice Meets Changed Scientific Understanding

Jennifer E. Laurin

93 Texas L. Rev. 1751

PDF Document

Many people have been convicted of crimes based upon science that was completely discredited after their conviction. Professor Laurin dubs the time between such a conviction and the change in scientific understanding as “science lag.” She details how she thinks the criminal justice system does and should take changes in scientific knowledge into effect by remedying already-adjudicated criminal cases.

Rethinking Judicial Review of Expert Agencies

Elizabeth Fisher, Pasky Pascual & Wendy Wagner

93 Texas L. Rev. 1681

PDF Document

When generalist courts review agency decisions, they are often faced with the problem of needing to provide judicial oversight while at the same time not second-guessing the agency’s technical expertise. Professor Fisher, Mr. Pascual and Professor Wagner performed an empirical study on national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) decisions to determine how courts decide these kinds of cases. They conclude that judicial review of agency decisions is a multifaceted collaborative effort between the agency and the courts and that internal yardsticks adopted by the agency provide helpful tools for courts to review agency decisions.

Serviceable Truths: Science for Action in Law and Policy

Sheila Jasanoff

93 Texas L. Rev. 1723

PDF Document

A discussion of the appropriate relationship between science and the law often devolves into discussing how scientific knowledge may be better transmitted into legal proceedings. Professor Jasanoff argues that this framing of the relationship between science and the law is asymmetric. She looks to science and technology studies in order to describe a more symmetric way of understanding the ideal relationship between science and the law.

Science and Policy in Setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards: Resolving the Ozone Enigma

Thomas O. McGarity

93 Texas L. Rev. 1783

PDF Document

Professor McGarity examines the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) ozone “rulemakings” in order to better understand the interaction of science and policy in promulgating national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). He concludes that the EPA’s approach to NAAQS, though not very sensitive to the costs involved, has managed to bring significant reduction in emissions of pollutants while not causing serious economic outcomes.

Constructing Evidence and Educating Juries: The Case for Modular, Made-In-Advance Expert Evidence About Eyewitness Identifications and False Confessions

Jennifer L. Mnookin

93 Texas L. Rev. 1811

PDF Document

Psychological testimony on the actual importance of certain kinds of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony and confession, has grown in the past few decades. The importance of understanding this kind of evidence has been highlighted by the many people who were convicted on eyewitness testimony but later exonerated by DNA evidence. Expert psychological testimony, however, is expensive and there are not enough experts to testify in every criminal case. Therefore, Professor Mnookin argues that premade, modular testimony should be created to be given to juries on these topics.

Science Disputes in Abortion Law

John A. Robertson

93 Texas L. Rev. 1849

PDF Document

Professor Robertson examines several representative disputes in abortion law that require courts to decide the constitutionality of abortion restrictions based on their scientific basis. He concludes that in this area of the law the specific legal question tends to control the outcome more than the validity of the science. He proposes that this may be true for other areas of the law as well.

Defining Death: Getting It Wrong for All the Right Reasons

Robert D. Truog

93 Texas L. Rev. 1885

PDF Document

The “dead donor rule” (DDR) is an implicit rule that controls the procurement of organs by, for instance, forbidding physicians from harvesting vital organs from living patients. Professor Truog provides a detailed scientific discussion on how science defines death and concludes that, under current law, patients may be legally dead but not dead by scientific standards, which would not conform with the DDR. He then examines the options available to society if its current definition of death does not conform with the DDR.

Of Horses, Donkeys, and Mules

David A. Anderson

94 Texas L. Rev. See Also 1

PDF Document

In this Essay, Professor Anderson analyzes the recent Supreme Court decision Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. and concludes that the Court’s disposition failed to address the issues presented by hybrid government–private speech.

The Conscious Congress: How Not to Define Overrides

Matthew R. Christiansen, William N. Eskridge Jr. & Sam N. Thypin-Bermeo

93 Texas L. Rev. See Also 289

PDF Document

Mr. Christiansen, Professor Eskridge and Mr. Thypin-Bermeo respond to Mr. Buatti and Professor Hasen’s recent response to Mr. Christiansen and Professor Eskridge’s article on congressional overrides.

Congratulations to Volume 94 New Members!

The Texas Law Review is proud to announce its volume 94 membership! Congratulations to all our new members, and welcome to TLR!

The Masthead is now available for download:

PDF Document

Congratulations to the Volume 94 Editorial Board!

The Texas Law Review is proud and excited to announce the Editorial Board for Volume 94. The members of Volume 93 are happy to pass the torch to such a fantastic group of people. A copy of the masthead for the Volume 94 Editorial board can be found here.

TLR Alumni Score the Top Grades on the Texas Bar Exam

The Texas Law Review would like to congratulate two of its Volume 92 alumni for achieving the top two scores on the July 2014 Texas Bar Exam. Jamie Yarbrough, who served as the Research Editor on Volume 92′s editorial board, had the top score followed closely by Michael Kelso, an Articles Editor on Volume 92′s editorial board. Mr. Yarbrough is currently working as an associate for Baker Botts in Houston while Mr. Kelso is clerking for Judge Carolyn King of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Congratulations to Volume 93 New Members!

The Texas Law Review is proud to announce its volume 93 membership!  Congratulations to all our new members, and welcome to TLR!

The Masthead is now available for download:

PDF Document