An Online Companion to Texas Law Review
Professor Ellickson responds to David Fagundes's discussion of the extralegal IP norms used to protect the pseudonyms adopted by roller derby participants.
Professor Michaels comments on Emily Kadens's critique of Lex Mercatoria.
Professor Blackman critiques the originalist methodology employed by Calabresi and Rickert.
Professors Listokin and Smith-Listokin respond to David Kohtz's proposals to improve historic preservation tax breaks.
Professor Diane H. Mazur adds context to Deborah N. Pearlstein’s analysis in The Soldier, the State, and the Separation of Power.
Professor Brudney responds to Widiss's article on Congressional override of judicial statutory interpretation.
Professor Charles A. Sullivan responds to Professor Widiss's article on Congressional override of judicial interpretation of statutory law.
Professor Christopher R. Leslie responds to Stephen Fraser's argument that the Department of Justice should use antitrust amnesty as a model for the creation of FCPA self-reporting incentives.
Messrs. Tarun and Tomczak respond to Stephen Fraser's argument that the Department of Justice should use antitrust amnesty as a model for the creation of FCPA self-reporting incentives.
