Category Archives: SA Vol. 94

No Room for the Poor—The Blight of Eminent Domain on America’s Lowest Economic Classes

By | SA Vol. 94 | No Comments

“Blight” is the label used by U.S. law to describe property that is considered to be dilapidated or injurious to public health. In much of the U.S., it is easier to use eminent domain to condemn a property if it is deemed “blighted.” This Note examines the negative effects that condemning such properties can have on residents of “blighted” areas and proposes some changes to the law that would better protect these residents from the costs associated with condemnation.

PDF

Blackhorse Down: Do NFL Teams Need Trademark Protection?

By | SA Vol. 94 | No Comments

In this Note, William Mason analyzes the economic effects of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to revoke federal trademark protection from the Washington Redskins and questions whether those effects are sufficient to force a change to the team’s name.  He argues that the protections and incentives provided by the NFL and collective bargaining will significantly damper any economic effect the Board’s decision may have, and instead suggests alternative areas where social and economic pressure may prove more successful.

PDF

Category Archives: SA Vol. 94

No Room for the Poor—The Blight of Eminent Domain on America’s Lowest Economic Classes

By | SA Vol. 94 | No Comments

“Blight” is the label used by U.S. law to describe property that is considered to be dilapidated or injurious to public health. In much of the U.S., it is easier to use eminent domain to condemn a property if it is deemed “blighted.” This Note examines the negative effects that condemning such properties can have on residents of “blighted” areas and proposes some changes to the law that would better protect these residents from the costs associated with condemnation.

PDF

Blackhorse Down: Do NFL Teams Need Trademark Protection?

By | SA Vol. 94 | No Comments

In this Note, William Mason analyzes the economic effects of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to revoke federal trademark protection from the Washington Redskins and questions whether those effects are sufficient to force a change to the team’s name.  He argues that the protections and incentives provided by the NFL and collective bargaining will significantly damper any economic effect the Board’s decision may have, and instead suggests alternative areas where social and economic pressure may prove more successful.

PDF