Professors Glenn H. Reynolds & Brannon P. Denning
91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 89
Professors Reynolds and Denning respond to Gregory Magarian’s article on the interpretation of the Second Amendment.
Professor Christopher J. Walker
91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 73
Professor Walker responds to Jud Mathews’s article on analyzing the deference framework in administrative law through a game theory lens.
Professor Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 59
Professor Wadhia responds to Robert Delahunty and John Yoo’s article on the constitutionality of deferred action and the DREAM Act.
Professor Kevin C. Walsh
91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 49
Professor Walsh responds to Ryan Scoville’s article on the severability of state law by federal courts.
Professor Joseph Blocher
91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 37
Professor Blocher responds to Gregory Magarian’s article on the implications of the First Amendment for the Second.
The Honorable Juan Hinojosa and
Ms. Lynn Garcia
91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 19
Senator Juan Hinojosa and the General Counsel for the Texas Forensic Science Commission respond to Ryan Goldstein’s Note regarding the states’ role in forensic science reform.
Eric S. Fish
91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 1
Recent Yale graduate Eric S. Fish responds to Calabresi and Rickert.
Tracy A. Thomas
90 Texas L. Rev. See Also 295
Professor Thomas responds to John Golden’s argument regarding patent-infringement injunctions.
Aaron Setliff
90 Texas L. Rev. See Also 193
The Director of the Texas Council on Family Violence provides context for Joyce Young’s argument that the state should create a domestic-abuse offender registry.
Jessica D. Gabel & Ashley D. Champion
90 Texas L. Rev. See Also 19
Professor Gabel and Ms. Champion agree with Mr. Goldstein’s argument that serious validity and reliability problems plague forensic science, but, using the recent Troy Davis case in Georgia as an illustration, they argue for federal rather than state oversight. Gabel and Champion assert that many states lack the funding to construct an adequate system and that the fragmentation caused by different state systems would be a significant impediment to reform. They suggest a federal agency that, like the Environmental Protection Agency, would set minimum standards but allow states to experiment with enhanced regulation.
